Maybe Belichick Was Trying to Shake That “Genius” Tag
Monday, November 16th, 2009Situation: The New England Patriots were up six points, 34-28, against the Indianapolis Colts, in Indy, with 2:08 to go and had possession of the ball on their own 28.            Â
Decision:Â Punt, of course!
But head coach Bill Belichick, possibly not yet recovered from the shell shock of the Colts’ previous possession - one in which Peyton Manning took his team 79 yards in 1:52 and scored a touchdown - using no times out!), decided to go for it. His reasoning?  His vaunted offense certainly ought to have been able to get two yards, for goodness sake. So he went for it.Â
And, got it! Or would have, had Kevin Faulk, the receiver on the play, not bobbled the pass. His initial reception was just beyond the 30 yard line (which would have resulted in a first down) but, once he bobbled the ball, was not given forward progress and the Pats came up about a half a yard short.
What the talking heads had only briefly mentioned, was that, on this series, due to a “miscommunication on personnel” (according to QB Tom Brady), NE was forced to take a time out. Actually, on the possession, the Pats took two times out (their final two). This meant that, although the completed pass was bobbled, it was by no means a foregone conclusion that Faulk came up short - and since the clock had not yet gone under two minutes, the call could be challenged. But . . . a team needs a time out in order to challenge. So, the Patriots had to take the official’s word for it that he spotted the ball properly.
Reactions: Sunday Night Football color man, Cris Collinsworth, vehemnetly disagreed with the decision. ESPN analyst Trent Dilfer called it a “horrific” call and gave no wiggle room, i.e. the decision was 100% wrong - period. Tony Dungy, a former colleague of Belichick’s (and coaches are notorious for sticking by each other because every one of them has been second guessed by people with 1/1,000,000th the amount of knowledge, so empathy runs deep) said, “You have to punt the ball. No matter how much you respect Peyton Manning (and no one respects him more than Dungy does), you have to punt the ball.” Even Rodney Harrison, a former player for Belichick and someone who understands the genius that is Bill Belichick, said, “This is the worst decision I’ve seen Bill Belichick make.”
Now, let’s step back, take a deep breath and give some rational, rather than emotional, thought to the decision. Any choice anyone makes in life has a risk vs. reward factor to it. Without prolonging this blog, the risk far outweighed the reward.
Sure, if they made it, the game would have ended. However, the season is just a shade over midway complete. While he is saying, “I trust you, offense, so much that I’ll risk going for it on our own 28, knowing full well, if we don’t make it, Peyton Manning will have to go (at most) a whisker under 30 yards in 2 minutes,” there’s a message he’s also sending is to his defense. “You guys did intercept Manning twice on the day and, in general, or at least up until that last oh-so-brief-drive, did as good a job on him as we could have hoped. But, if we punt, we’ll be giving him 70 yards and two minutes to beat us.” With that (not so) subliminal message, is there any wonder they couldn’t stop him from engineering the winnning drive of 29 yards?
This game was the first in 88 contests that a Bill Belichick-coached team lost after being ahead by 13 or more in the fourth quarter. Actually, the Pats were up 17 and were up 13 with less than four minutes to go!Â
Although his initial reaction seemed not to be second guessing his decision, but rather, questioning whether they really didn’t make it, i.e. feeling they got a bad spot, look for Belichick, one of the greatest NFL coaches ever, to act like the leader Antoine de Saint-Exupery described:
“A chief is a man who accepts responsibility. He says, ‘I was beaten.’ He does not say, ‘My men were beaten.’ Thus speaks a real man.”