Today’s Athletes Get More - but Pay for It
Thursday, December 30th, 2010The decision from the NFL commissioner’s office on the Brett Favre case was announced and the result was a fine of 50 large. Roger Goodell assessed the fine based, not on evidence, but Favre’s not being forthcoming with the NFL’s investigation. The majority opinion seems to be that he got off lightly.
When the NCAA went public with its decision on the Cam Newton ordeal, public opinion was pretty much identical. I even heard one radio talk show host claim it was ridiculous, that obviously Newton had known and the NCAA should have suspended him immediately. So much for “innocent until proven guilty.” Yet that’s the prevailing thought in each case. And why not? In both of those instances, common sense would lead someone to believe the offender got off easily. In fact, if they did what their accusers claimed, the court of public opinion would ring true.
Let’s go back to the origination of each allegation. In both instances, the “modern” way of life exposed (excuse the pun in the Favre case) the culprits. For Newton, it was someone who, for whatever reason, decided to “come clean and tell all.” In Favre’s situation, technology did him in - even though, according to what’s been put out there for the general public, none of the alleged sext photos have been seen.
Back in the day, as the saying goes, none of this would ever have been public knowledge. Reporters used to travel with teams (on the professional level) and even drink (and participate in other activities unrelated to the playing surface) with the athletes - but mum was the word.
With seemingly everyone having a cell phone or other gadget that enables the user to take and send pictures (or even video goings-on and record conversations), the modern day athlete - with all the perks their predecessors did without (and on the professional level, this includes outrageous salaries) had better understand that a higher level of accountability accompanies those goodies. Bad ideas, such as Greg Oden’s texting self-portraits, Gilbert Arenas’ bringing guns into a locker room (although he meant no harm) and tweeting absurd messages (too many to begin to list) can derail a career or at least severely tarnish a reputation (or legacy). That fact is as much a part of the “new” world of sports just as much as world-wide fame and mega-deals which set an athlete and his family up for life.
Athletes claim invasion of privacy and in many cases, they’re spot on. Unfortunately, with the good comes the bad. I recall reading an excerpt from a book in which there’s a story about journalists riding to a game on the same train as the ballclub they were covering. In the middle of their card game, the door to their car burst open and Babe Ruth ran naked down the aisle, followed closely by a naked woman wielding, if memory serves me correctly, a knife. What one of the sportswriters said at that moment is no longer true - and today’s athlete had better realize it. And the scene needn’t be nearly so explosive.
The sportswriter was quoted as saying:
“There goes another story we won’t be reading about in tomorrow’s paper.”