Archive for the ‘Wimbledon’ Category

Different View of Must Win Games

Thursday, July 5th, 2012

Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer play in one semifinal at Wimbledon.  Andy Murray and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga square off in the other.  The term “must win” has been and will be heard innumerable times between now and the end of the matches.  Not so much for Djokovic because he’s won so much it’s tough to call any match he plays a must-win.  Similar for Tsonga because if he won in the semis, the finals would be another must win and how many times can the term be used before its meaning gets diluted?  Although we seem to be testing that theory.

As far as Federer goes, however, the duo of Djokovic and Rafael Nadal seem to have ended Fed’s run at championships.  With his buddy Rafa out of the picture, winning in the semis could give him another Grand Slam opportunity in which he actually would be favored - just like old times.  So Friday will be a must win for Federer.

If ever the term must win had a special meaning, it’s for Andy Murray who’s carrying an entire nation on his shoulders.  Most golf pros, under oath, will admit winning the Masters is the ultimate for a golfer.  Tennis pros, if truthful, will say the same about Wimbledon.  To hail from Britain, as Murray does, turns up the heat.  Since the last British tennis player to win Wimbledon was Fred Perry - in 1936 - the weight can become overwhelming.  Somewhat similar to what Tsonga would feel if he were in the same position in the French Open final.

When Nadal lost (in the second round), it made this year’s Wimbledon even more dramatic for Murray.  Why?  Heard on one sports network: Murray only has to beat either Djokovic or Federer this year to win it all.  Only?  Not to mention he has to beat Tsonga to even get the chance to win it.  Fall in the semis and he’ll be accused of looking ahead.  Which is what all of England seems to be doing.

Murray has even compared himself to LeBron James.  To hear Murray, who’s mentioned he’s “probably extremely stressed right now,”  one wonders if he wouldn’t be better served to look at the situation as the former Buffalo Bills coach, Marv Levy, did.  The Bills continued to make it to the Super Bowl, only to lose each time.  When asked if that particular year’s Super Bowl wa sa mjst win, Levy replied:

“World War II was a must win.”

The Ultimate Superlative

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

When you work for Jerry Tarkanian, as I did from 1995-2002 (and, since I host his radio show, I guess I still am), you hear more superlatives than anyone who ever lived.  See what I did there?

Jerry was always saying this player was the greatest he’d ever seen.  During our first year at Fresno State, Jerry had brought in a kid who, if nothing else, looked like a player.  Lithe body, sinewy, good-looking kid.  He got into a defensive stance on the first day of practice and Jerry turned to me and said, “I think he might be the best defensive player I’ve ever coached.”

I looked at Jerry, whom I’d known for many years, but had just started working for him and said in amazement, “Better than Stacy Augmon?”  “The Plastic Man” was the first player voted as the best collegiate defensive player three years in a row!  That was Jerry.  The best player ever, the best game ever, the best whatever ever.

Tark’s not the only one who goes a little overboard when something truly outstanding is accomplished.  On the other hand, I tend to go in the opposite direction.  No matter what, I always think that sometime, somewhere, somebody had to be at least as good.

Yet, without it even being completed, I will say, unequivocally, the greatest show of physical and mental strength - and talent - in a competitive, pressure-packed, individual (meaning between two participants, e.g. not scaling Mt. Everest or swimming the English Channel) professional sporting event, has got to be the match at Wimbledon between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut.  After 10 hours, there’s only one word that can describe their play and it’s the most overused word in the English language (hey, another superlative):

“Unbelievable!”Â